Arguendo

Arguendo is the Core Project in the Lex Coterie Group of Organizations.

Tuesday, 22 October 2013

FOOD SECURITY BILL- AN ANALYSIS.




Need of bill- the latest global hunger index of international food policy research institute says that India ranks a low 65 out of 79 countries in terms of child mortality, malnourishment, and low child weight. To address this nutritional deficiency and set thing right, national advisory council wrote to p on October 27, with framework of food security bill.


Highlights of the bill


• The Bill seeks to offer rice at Rs 3 per kg, wheat at Rs 2 per kg and coarse cereals at Rs 1 per kg to the intended beneficiaries. Up to 75 per cent of the rural population and 50 per cent of the urban population will get 5 kg of food grain monthly. The poorest who fall under the Anthodia Anna Yojana will continue with their present monthly entitlement of 35 kg of food grains.
• The Bill will entitle around 80 million of India’s 1.2 billion populations to subsidized food grain under the Targeted Public Distribution System.
• States are given the responsibility to decide on eligibility criteria based on socio-economic and caste census (SECC) data. However, the SECC survey is likely to take six more months.
• Pregnant women and lactating mothers would receive a maternity benefit of at least Rs 6,000.
• Children aged six months to 14 years will get take-home rations or hot cooked food.
• The central government will also provide money to states and union territories if it runs low on grain as well as providing them with “assistance” towards the cost of intra-state transportation and handling of grains.
• In a bid to give women more authority in running their households, the oldest adult woman in each house would be considered the head of that household for the issuing of ration cards.
• At the coverage and entitlement now proposed, the total estimated annual food grains requirement is 612.3 lakh tons and the corresponding estimated food subsidy for implementation of NFSB, at 2013-14 costs, is about Rs 1,24,747 crore.
• There will be state and district level redressal mechanism with designated nodal officers. Redressal mechanism may also include call centers, helpline etc.
• The Bill provides for penalty to be imposed on public servants or authority, if found guilty of failing to comply with the relief recommended by the District Grievance Redressal Officer


PRIMARY CONCERNS
  1. Steep cost- the main concern about the bill is doing out rs 1.3 lakh per year, which is major chunk of tax payers money. That is up from the rs. 90,000 roe being currently spent on food subsidies by the centre.
  2. Who will bear the burden? There is still no clarity as to who will bear the burden of the massive subsidy that will be shelled out. But if the onus falls on the farmers, it will make their life even harder. The low prices of the subsidized food can distort the market and farmers who can’t sell to the government – assured programme will lose out on the open market because prices will be forced down
  3. Pilferage- the big concern is whether the food will reach the beneficiaries. the possible pilferage by middleman and racketeers and wastage because of derelict supply chain and inefficient PDS and integrated child development services .
Defining the poor- bill is categorically aimed at the poor, but universalisation is required sine it is rather difficult to monitor who is rich and poor. According to the plan panels estimation in 04-05, 30 crore people lived below the poverty line. However according to the rural development ministry India has 40 crore poor.



Author- 











Madhvi Chopra
5th Year,
Guru Go bind Singh Indraprastha University 

Monday, 21 October 2013

The Street Reality.

Providing balance through legal framework, between fundamental rights to do business and right of public to utilise same place


Approximately 2.5% of India’s total population sole source of existence is through street vending. A self employed vendor can be considered as a micro-entrepreneur who earns his living by selling products and services on the streets. Being in informal sector this is one of the most unorganized and unregulated professions in India with minimum policy intervention. Although a national policy was formulated in the year 2004 which was revised in year 2009 but the provisions in it are yet to be materialized.
Size of street vending population
As the most visible segment of the urban informal economy, it is indisputable that there are thousands of street vendors in most big cities of developing world. Yet it is exceedingly difficult to produce accurate estimates of the number of street traders in any given city. In some countries official statics on street vendors are available, though they likely underestimate the total number of people engaged in street vending.
Street Vending- A professions of Ordeals
Street vending is usually correlated with low and insecure income. In most cities it is assumed to be an illegal encroachment of public land and a source of chaos and nuisance. To make matters worse regulation of street vending generally follows the “conflict model”. Various town authorities often issue eviction orders arbitrarily in the pretext of traffic jams, health reasons, public inconvenience and encroachment. Often a street vendor’s income is limited by the natural forces, seizure of goods and insecurity of losing the space for vending. What a Vendor needs is an enabling environment in which he can develop his entrepreneur skills peacefully. Keeping in mind, the livelihood of street vendors, government passed Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Bill, 2012. The bill aimed at providing social security and livelihood rights to street vendors


Highlights of the Bill


The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Bill, 2012 was introduced in the Lok Sabha on September 6, 2012.
  • The Bill shall not be applicable to land owned or controlled by the Railways under the Railways Act, 1989.
  • The Bill requires every street vendor to be registered with the Town Vending Committee. The Bill states that the minimum age of a street vendor has to be 14 years.
  • Street Vendors have been defined to include ‘any person engaged in vending of articles, goods, food etc or offering services to the general public in a street lane, side walk, footpath, pavement, public park, or any other public or private area. It includes hawkers, peddlers, and squatters.
  • The Bill provides that no person can undertake any street vending activity without obtaining the required vending certificate. Every registered street vendor shall be issued an identity card.
  • The Bill states that a vending certificate shall be issued to stationary vendors, mobile vendors, or any other category of vendor recognised by the appropriate government.
  • The Bill requires every local authority to frame a street vending plan. The plan has to be reframed every five years. The plan shall determine the vending zones as (a) restriction-free vending zones; (b) restricted vending
  • The Bill defines natural markets as “a market where sellers and buyers have traditionally congregated for more than a specified period for the sale and purchase of specific products or services and has been determined as such by the local authority.”
  • The appropriate government shall frame a street vending scheme. The scheme shall include amongst others: (a) the manner of applying for registration,
(b) The period within which the decision has to be made and,
(c) Any other condition to be imposed on the vending certificate.
  • The Bill empowers the local authority to relocate street vendors. The authority may do so, of the street vendors are causing a public nuisance or obstructing the movement of the public. A registered street vendor who has been relocated shall be entitled to new site for vending.
  • The local authority is also empowered to confiscate the goods of the vendors in the manner specified in the street vending scheme.
  • The Bill empowers the Town Vending Committee to cancel or suspend the vending certificate. This may be done if the vendor has breached the conditions of street vending either under the Bill or under the street vending scheme.
Key Issues and Analysis
Currently, street vending is regulated under municipal laws enacted by state legislatures. Parliament’s competence to legislate on this issue depends on whether the Bill is interpreted as substantively addressing rights and obligations of street vendors (Concurrent List) or relating to municipal zoning (State List). 
The Bill does not specify principles to be followed by governments in issuing vending certificates, allocating vending zones and the number of vendors per zone.  Absence of such norms could defeat the purpose of enacting a law to ensure uniformity in the legal framework. 
The Bill does not require the stakeholders to be consulted in the formulation of the street vending plan.  This could lead to a lack of safeguards in ensuring that plan is determined in a fair manner.  
The central law will have overriding effect on state laws that are inconsistent with the Bill.  Current state laws differ with the Bill in terms of powers of the TVC, and mechanism for dispute resolution.
The Standing Committee suggests making the Bill applicable to the Railways, incorporating specific provisions of the scheme in the Bill, and consultation with the TVC on the vending plan
Balancing objectives of the Bill:  livelihood rights vs.  Urban planning needs

In regulating urban street vending activities, the Bill aims to balance three key objectives: securing the right to livelihood of street vendors, ensuring congestion free public spaces and streets, and convenience of vending services for customers. The Bill provides a broad framework for registration of street vendors, grounds for relocation, eviction and confiscation of goods, functions of the local authority and Town Vending Committee, and a grievance redressal mechanism.  The Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Bill says the law is proposed for “ensuring uniformity in the legal framework across states and union territories”. However, the Bill leaves several aspects of the regulation of street vending to the street vending scheme that is to be formulated by state governments and implemented by local authorities. The Bill does not specify the principles to be considered by local authorities in issuing vending certificates, allocating vending zones and determining the number of vendors per zone, or the public purpose for which vendors may be relocated.

Author- Madhvi Chopra.

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

CUSTODIAL DEATHS – A LEGALIZED CRIME



Custodial Violence means torture in police custody. Death in custody is when a person dies when in the custody of the police, prison service or other authorities. Death in custody of police is not an uncommon event now; still it remains a controversial subject, with the authorities often being accused of using lethal force, abuse, neglect, racism and over-ups of the causes of death. Custodial deaths are perhaps one of the worst crimes in a civilized society governed by the Rule of Law.


A reading of the morning newspapers almost every day carrying reports of dehumanizing torture and death in custody of police, etc. is indeed depressing. In almost every state there is an increase in frequency of deaths in custody, generally prescribed by the newspapers as lock-up deaths. The increasing incidence of torture and death custody has assumed such alarming proportions that is a affecting the credibility of the Rule of Law and the administration of criminal justice system. Society’s cry for justice has never been louder. While the reported cases of custodial deaths are increasing in India, statistics are difficult to come by, as there is government apathy to transparency.


To the less gulling, the Rosy picture of “Indian shining” appears less rosy as India is in the throes of a shocking and disturbing crisis fuelled by violence that the State inflicts on its citizens thought encounter killings, police torture and custodial deaths. Respect for human rights is the sine qua non of any civilized society and the disrespect for human rights is inimical to civil liberties granted to its citizens by the state. By this standard, the Indian State lamentably fails and is a cause for concern for those who value civil  liberties.    
They are part of a “deliberate and conscious state administrative practice” for which successive Indian governments must bear the responsibility.


“Custodial torture” is naked violation of human dignity and degradation which destroys, to a very large extent, the individual personality. It is a calculated assault on human dignity and whenever human dignity is wounded, civilization takes a step backward-flag of humanity must on each such occasion fly half –mast. The word torture today has become synonymous with the darker side of the human civilization.


It is a wound in the soul so painful that sometimes you can almost touch it, but it is also such intangible that there is no way to heal it. Torture is anguish squeezing in your chest, cold as ice and heavy as a stone paralyzing as sleep and dark as the abyss. Torture is despair and fear and rage and hate. It is a desire to kill and destroy including yourself  .


In recent years, third degree torture and custodial deaths have become an intrinsic part of police investigations and the injury inflicted on the prisoners is sometimes unbearable and its use of torture and third degree methods against suspects in police lockups remains standard operating procedure in post-Independence India.


The Supreme Court has attributed this increase, to the “devilish devices adopted by those at the helm of affairs who proclaim from rooftops to be the defenders of democracy and protectors of peoples’ rights and yet do not hesitate to condescend behind the screen to let loose their men in uniform to settle personal scores, feigning ignorance of what happens and pretending to be peace-loving puritans and saviors of citizens’ right”.


Lack of accountability and almost total immunity enjoyed by the police until recently accounts for the increasing instances of custodial deaths.


The long delays in courts in prosecuting the guilty police personnel, due to the ignorance of judges create a climate of impunity for such crimes to flourish. The governments also reward policemen or paramilitary personnel, which actually encourage encounter killing. The lack of legislation outlawing torture is another reason. Further, even the compensation paid to the surviving members of the victims murdered by the police personnel remains a pittance and if and when it is awarded it is a paltry.
Torture is the only way available with the police to find the clues from the victims. The police save influential and wealthy offenders by implicating innocent people and torturing them until a ‘confession’ is obtained. The communal and caste divide in India is closely linked with torture. The police or other state institutions are directly involved in most of the communally charged violence.



Respect for human dignity while protecting life and liberty of an individual is the cardinal principal of the Indian Constitution. The constitution has elaborate provisions to prevent Police brutalities. Article 19, Article 20, Article 21, Article 22, Article 32, And Article 226 of The torture. Moreover the Indian Evidence Act prohibits use of confession made before the police officer and the one obtained through inducement, threat of promise in criminal trials.


Attentiveness to these human rights concerns is not simply a moral and legal imperative, but also a crucial strategic imperative. As the Supreme Court of India has recognized, ‘terrorism often thrives where human rights are violated’ and ‘the lack of hope for justice provides breeding grounds for terrorism.’ Why the huge gap between the positive approach and the increasing use of torture is not bridged, is a big question.


Abraham Lincoln once said,      “if you once forfeit the confidence of our fellow citizens you can never regain their respect and esteem.”


Despite the fact that we have detailed provisions to protect and safeguard the human rights of the people, we see that a steady process of devaluation of human dignity and personality is irresistibly advancing and brutal betrayal of those basic rights, which are enshrined in International Bill Of Human Rights, becomes a common scenario. The human rights are daily providing to be a mere teaming illusion and promise of unreality. However there is a new emerging would legal order. The Indian experiment in enacting the protection of Human rights Act is a hopeful start. The human rights jurisprudence is gaining judicial reverence in Indian especially where life and liberty are violated by state violence.



The prevalence of custodial violence also needs deeper introspection. Investigating agencies often use the excuse of public pressure to solve ‘crime’ as justification for resorting to ‘third-degree’ methods of interrogation. This is also supported by public condo nation and even sanction of such torture. However torture and custodial violence is not limited to interrogation alone, but also seen as ‘just’ punishment and ‘fair’ exercise of police authority. The award by the judiciary of the death sentence to police officials in such cases of custodial crime merely reinforces and legitimizes this culture of violence by resorting to brute force as punishment for the ‘criminal’. Resorting to capital punishment is not the solution to violent crime. 
Suggested reforms
The training imparted to policemen should include-
  1. Inculcating democratic sense and idealism Understanding that descent on part of public is not necessarily a threat to public order and the idea that the police is basically to help the public
  2. Better amenities should be provided at police station and lock up traffic police have a high – visibility profile and they , therefore , need special attention in terms of improvement
  3. The system of patrolling must be revamped so that the public get the feeling that the crime can be prevented.
Other reforms
  1. investigation wing should be separated from law and order wing
  2. There should be security commission at national and state level as recommended by the  national police commission.
  3. In  each district, a separate police superintendent should be made  responsible for collection and dissemination of criminal intelligence


    By- Madhivi Chopra. 
          

Wednesday, 2 October 2013

Project SWABHIMAAN






Project Swabhimaan is an All India Free Online Mock Test for Differently Able CLAT
Aspirants. It is a campaign run by CLATJunction.com for differently able CLAT aspirants
(PWD). CLAT Junction started this campaign on 2nd Oct 2013 nationwide. And for the purpose
to encourage the a differently able CLAT aspirant for writing CLAT 2014, clatjunction.com will
award free mock test series to top 3 scorer and 50% fee waiver on courses of CLAT Junction to
next 15 top scorer.
The test will be taken online on date 11 November 2013. Last date of
registration is 8th November 2013 for participants.
 Interested participant can send their registration form along with the scanned copy of their PWD certificate online on
clatjunction@gmail.com or ameypandey@gmail.com after downloading registration form from www.clatjunction.com

CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS

CLAT Junction also invites CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS for this noble cause. In order to join
this noble cause one can send his CV/Resume to clatjunction@gmail.com or
ameypandey@gmail.com. There are no eligibility criteria for volunteers. Volunteers will be
given a certificate after the completion of cause. Last date for the application for call for
volunteers is 15th October 2013. Lastly I would like to make an appeal to all the readers to
spread this cause so that maximum number of people can get benefit. Call for Volunteers
CLAT Junction invites volunteers from all over India for this noble cause to show their support
and give their hand to help project SWABHIMAAN. Work of volunteers is to draw attention of
maximum numbers of people towards this cause and completing allocated work within given
period of time. One can also be part of project by helping The team SWABHIMAAN by
providing quality questions for mock test, hence Teachers can also join this campaign. All the
volunteers will get a certificate after the completion of this project. Register yourself as volunteer
by downloading form and send it to clatjunction@gmail.com or ameypandey@gmail.com along
with attached copy of your CV/ Resume and a Cover Letter. Forms are available at
www.clatjunction.com

Last date of registering as volunteer is 15th October 2013.

Important Dates

Announcement: 2nd October 2013
Date of Examination: 11th November 2013
Last date of Registration for Test: 8th November 2013
Last date for Registration of Call For Volunteers: 15th October 2013
Result will announce on: 20th November 2013

Contact Details:

Project Coordinator: Ms. Neha Singh (9472474746)
Convener Project: Mr. Amey Pandey (9472042366)
Co Convener: Mr. Takshendra Sharma (8560880785)

Email id:
clatjunction@gmail.com
ameypandey@gmail.com
Believe you can succeed  :)